|
FC-10
THE EFFICACY OF EBASTINE, A SECOND-GENERATION ANTIHISTAMINE,
IN THE TREATMENT OF ALOPECIA AREATA
Y. Yoshizawa, S. Kawana. Department of Dermatology,
Nippon Medical School.Tokyo. Japan.
Background: Although its etiology is not entirely clear,
the infiltration of inflammatory cells is increased around
hair follicles in lesions of alopecia areata (AA), and the
type of immune cells that are increased are mast cells. Such
evidence suggests that mast cells play some role in the pathogenesis
of AA. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the
efficacy of a second-generation antihistamine in the treatment
of AA. Methods: Two studies were performed. In study I, 9
patients with moderate AA were treated with diazepam for 3
months and patients who did not respond to the diazepam therapy
were then treated with ebastine, a second-generation antihistamine,
instead of diazepam. In study II, 22 patients with moderate
AA were initially treated with ebastine for at least 3 months.
The efficacy of these medications was checked after 3 months
of the therapy. If any benefit effects were noted at that
time, the therapy was continued until 5 months and the final
efficacy was evaluated. Results: In study I, of the 9 patients,
only one (11%) showed an excellent response to diazepam. Of
the remaining 8 patients, 5 (62%) showed an excellent response
to the subsequent ebastine therapy. In study II, 13 out of
the 22 patients (59%) showed an excellent response. Together,
18 out of 30 patients (60%) were excellent responders to ebastine
therapy, excluding the patient who responded to diazepam.
Ebastine therapy also showed a tendency to be more effective
in patients with emotional stress than in those without stress.
There were no statistical differences in eosinophil counts,
in serum IgE levels, and in serum interleukin 4 levels between
excellent or poor responders to ebastine. Serum IgE levels
were, however, significantly decreased after ebastine therapy
in the excellent responders, while the poor responders had
no change in IgE levels. Conclusion: We propose that the administration
of a second-generation antihistamine is an efficient therapy
for moderate AA however, the results obtained here should
be interpreted with caution, as is the case for most open
studies.
|